Short-Term or Long-Term Rental in Los Angeles: What the Numbers Show
Verdict: Long-term rental wins for most investors. Short-term rental (Short-Term) generates roughly 93% more gross revenue, but LA's owner-occupancy requirement effectively blocks investor-owned short-term rentals. Even where permitted, net yields remain thin after costs.
Best For: Appreciation-focused investors comfortable with low cash-flow yields, betting on long-term property value growth in a premium coastal market.
Scores out of 10 across yield, regulations, tax, risk, and market fundamentals. How we score
Underlying Assumptions (data as of April 2026):
- Property Price: 3-bedroom houses estimated at around $932,962
- Monthly Long-Term Rent: Approximately $2,869
- Short-Term Rental Nightly Rate: Around $394 per night (varies seasonally)
- Assumed Short-Term Rental Occupancy: 51% average across the region (varies significantly between specific locations)
- Available Short-Term Rental Nights: 330 per year (assumes 35 days for cleaning, changeovers, and maintenance)
- Regulations: Heavily restricted. Los Angeles requires owner-occupancy for short-term rentals; investor-owned properties are generally not eligible. Owner-occupants face a 120 unhosted-night cap. Home-Sharing registration ($199) required. 14% Transient Occupancy Tax applies. City of LA Home-Sharing rules
See your neighborhood's full short-term rental vs long-term rental breakdown in the dashboard
Estimates for a typical 3-bedroom house. Figures are modelled from market data; not guaranteed outcomes.
The numbers tell a clear story. LA's median 3-bedroom house price is notably higher than the California average and several multiples of the national median. Rents are higher too, but not proportionally so, which compresses the gross yield to 3.7%, below both the state average of 4.0% and the national average of 5.3%.
This is the classic premium-market trade-off. Investors in Los Angeles are not buying for cash flow; they are buying for location value, long-term appreciation, and portfolio diversification into one of the world's most supply-constrained housing markets. Rents tend to be sticky and resilient during downturns, providing a floor even when appreciation pauses. For more on how data sources feed these comparisons, see the methodology.
Why Investors Accept Lower Yields in Los Angeles
A 3.7% gross yield looks anaemic compared to the national median of 5.3%. So why does capital keep flowing into LA? Several structural factors underpin the appreciation thesis.
First, supply constraints are severe. California's permitting process, environmental review requirements, and community opposition to new housing keep construction well below demand. Los Angeles added population for decades while underbuilding, creating a persistent supply deficit that supports both rents and prices.
Second, LA's economy is unusually diversified across entertainment, technology, trade (the Port of LA is the busiest in the Western Hemisphere), healthcare, and aerospace. This economic breadth provides resilience that single-industry cities lack.
Third, Proposition 13 caps annual property tax increases at 2%, regardless of market appreciation. An investor buying today at $932,962 locks in a property tax base that grows slowly, while the property's market value may appreciate far faster. Over a 10-year hold, this divergence significantly improves after-tax returns compared to states with frequent reassessment.
The practical implication: LA is not a market where you screen for gross yield. It is a market where total return (appreciation plus modest rental income minus costs) determines the investment case. The dashboard lets you model these scenarios at the suburb level.
Investment Bottom Line for Los Angeles
Los Angeles is an appreciation-driven market with thin cash flow yields. Long-term rental is the default strategy for investors; short-term rental is effectively blocked for non-owner-occupied properties. Net yields of approximately 1.7% for long-term rental mean that investors relying solely on rental income will see minimal cash-on-cash returns, especially with leverage.
The investment case rests on long-term property value growth, depreciation-driven tax benefits, and the resilience of a supply-constrained, economically diversified metro. Suburb selection matters enormously: yields range from 6.7% in the most affordable areas to under 2% in premium west-side locations. That variance is why modelling at the suburb level, not the county level, is essential.
| Investor Type | Fit |
|---|---|
| Cash Flow Focused | Poor |
| Appreciation Focused | Excellent |
| Short-Term Rental Operator | Not Viable (investor-owned banned) |
| High Leverage (80%+ LTV) | Poor |
Data reflects market conditions as of April 2026. California rental market insights
Explore Los Angeles in the dashboard
Free preview with neighborhood-level data, every bedroom count, every property type.
View Los Angeles →See your neighborhood's full short-term rental vs long-term rental breakdown
$19 for 24-hour access. All neighborhoods, all property types. Get access
This information is for educational purposes only and should not be considered financial or legal advice. Regulations and market conditions change frequently. Verify current rules with local authorities before making investment decisions.